Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jcookc6
It seems to me that the last time we were the clear cut winner in a war was WW2. What did we do in that war? We bombed the crap out of the enemy, made parking lots out of thier cities. Yes, a lot of innocent people were killed or hurt, but whoever said war was nice. But, we won the war. After the war, we rebuilt the 2 countries, and they seem to have survived. If the politically correct left would allow us to do it now, maybe we wouldnt have terrorists killing innocent people, just to kill people.
These people hate you, and would kill you in a second, no matter how much compassion you have them. You can't practice diplomacy with them, for they will just laugh at you and kill you. They did fire the first shot.
|
you talk about nuking entire cities killing thousands of civilians, followed by "we wouldn't have terrorists killing innocent people". we're using the word "terrorists" to describe all the wrong groups/individuals these days, no? nuking any middle eastern country would be global suicide, and besides, whom would you prefer to bomb? the big bad "terrorists" are all over the map, from the americas, africa, asia to european nations, they don't all gather in specific spot waiting to be dealt with. you may nuke anything you wish, but this will not end their mission but rather fuel them further to obliterate your western ways, all while crushing your own hope of strong international relations. whether the leaders are around or destroyed is irrelevant.
quite frankly, they had good reason to kill the foreign invader, whether in uniform or otherwise. If America was invaded and constituted of only guerilla fighters, they would surely kill the enemy in uniform as well, as would any country. people never view both perspectives, and not only is this dangerous, but it can make you no different than your “enemy”.