07-06-2005, 08:44 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
whosoever
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RusCrimson
This analysis is fundamentally correct, except that there are 7 states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsi) with laws on the books that would "kick-in" if Roe is overturned. I would imagine that some of those states would invalidate the law in the State Supreme, and that some states not on the list would outlaw it.
However, the tendency of contemporary state legislatures is to not outlaw abortion outright, but to put in place restrictions on it. This is, in my opinion, consistent with consitutional ideals. If the people want to put a 24 hour waiting period so people have time to think about it, then they should be able to do so. If they want parental notification, partial birth abortion ban, etc., then I see no reason why the states should not be able to do that.
|
More than that, there are several states that simply due to a lack of qualified doctors, it is quite difficult to obtain an abortion. These de-facto bans (produced by protesting activity and social pressure) would probably gain momentum in the event that Roe was overturned. I'm thinking No Dak in particular...where the MN planned parenthood flies in a doctor once a week.
__________________
For God so loved creation, that God sent God's only Son that whosoever believed should not perish, but have everlasting life.
-John 3:16
|
|
|