Quote:
Originally Posted by xepherys
Wrong, wrong, wrong... this is one this we DON'T want to look at as a precedent. We want to look at it as a mistake, soon to be, hopefully, forgotten. We do NOT want the fed to hold emergency meetings about things outside of their scope of duty. Yes it happened, now let's all try to pretend it didn't... please!?
|
![LOL](/tfp/images/smilies/lol.gif)
wish that it were that easy to forget.... but I am with you ... Schiavo had no right to be Fed. And no emergency meetings.... well show how power hungry the party truly was....
However this case does constitute Fed. Court as it is a Constitutional issue.... however, I would hope it isn't ever necessary and the next court drives it down without even having to think about it.
I have a feeling this is one case that truly will be interesting to follow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xepherys
Did you not read my first post. I'm sorry, maybe I talked too much. My initial point was, this is an unconstitutional ruling. The whole point of my post was to show that "fringe" religions are bullshit, and that any religion should have the same merit in the US.
|
To be quite honest I was so used to having noone on the right comment truly and with thought on the issue, that I thought you were a "Lib" (sorry if you are insulted not meant to be).... Plus not sure we have ever crossed paths so I don't know where you truly stand politically.... Your post was very well written and I am sorry I didn't comment on it..... Again you showed me someone that wanted to open dialogue and is knowledgeable about the subject.
![Thumbs Up](/tfp/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)