OFKU0

I'll accept that. The problem I have though is first it was Chretien, then Gagliano who wanted to shut down the inquiry. Makes me wonder why.

As for Gomery, I have lost all faith in the precedings and really feel nothing will come about, and if something does, it will be minor characters that get shafted. We have Corriveau who stated he directly spoke with Chretien about sponsorships and who and where should get what.

But more importantly this past week, we had the judge himself saying that the testimony of Breault, the guy who is fingering peoples involvement, showing a money trail of corruption etc,...that his testimony has yet to be proven. What the fuck. We have a line up of people saying,..."I don't recall, I don't remember, I'm not aware, and on and on and on,...yet the guy who is spilling the beans is being questioned about his validity. Fuck off.

I can see why people will lie or just "not recall" to save their asses but why would a guy seemingly tell the truth and potential ruin his career, just to be lying about the supposed truth? It just doesn't add up.

And I'll say it again, nothing of any substance will come of this inquiry. Oh wait,..one thing will. The Tories will be blamed for the 32 million wasted money for pushing for an inquiry in the first place. Incidentally, did any one else hear of more Liberal lies this week when it was stated that the inquiry has costed 72 million? And it was Gomery who himself who said they are still under the 32 million budget. T.v and papers picked up on the exorbitant 72 figure of waste, but never retracted. No wonder most people don't know what the fuck is going on.

__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.