View Single Post
Old 04-28-2005, 09:55 AM   #37 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
the general part

can i ask who on "the left" or on the "extreme left" (whatever they hell these are) seriously would BAN any form of religious expression at the personal level? could you provide links?

my experience from many years "on the left" is that this entity is a simple fantasy, a kind of structural feature of the politics of the extreme right--engage in a offensive action? posit a counter-image of your actions, its mirror image, blame them for the same thing and on that basis justify what you want to do.

what i do see--and all the time--is deep concern about the **political mobilization** of the extreme right of the american evanglical movement. because--as i have said repeatedly above--the shift in registers from personal belief to political action entails radical changes in what would otherwise be personal beliefs--in terms of implications--because the extreme right woudl prefer to remake not only laws but the whole judiciary system (and the balance of powers that is articulated through it) in order to impose--and i mean impose--laws rooted in their particular beliefs on everyone, and to disable (to the extent possble) processes of judicial review.

this is a logic of dictatorship.

that most defenders of the christian right use their inability to make basic logical distinctions between levels of activity to shriek about how persecuted they are when they encounter opposition to what i understand as their beliefs as the basis for political proposals/arguments--that is that they refuse (for entirely instrumental reasons) to recognize that they are acting politically---is a real problem.

=====

lebell:

thanks for the last post. it is an interesting perspective on what you are doing in this space. i wonder about the extent to which your idea of a new paradigm involves shutting out folk like myself, who operate from political viewpoints that you appear to disagree with. top be clear: it is not a new paradigm that i wonder about--but who gets to influence it, to shape it--where the dialogue about this new paradigm you talk about unfolds--what is sure is that such dialogue rarely happens here. which is maybe a limitation of the form (message boards) rather than of the folk who interact within it.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite

Last edited by roachboy; 04-28-2005 at 10:00 AM..
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360