If you fried 2 or 3 processors then you shouldn't be OC'ing in the first place. It's actually sorta hard to fry a processor by overclocking.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6b75/d6b75c3747d3b8a0f92408af1485908d433ae864" alt="Smilie"
Every motherboard made in the past few years has thermal detection onboard that turn off the PC if the heat threshhold is exceeded. If you're upping the voltage by such a large amount that it fried the processor then I'd consider different options.
Do what I'm doing when I upgrade next: buy a good processor so you won't have to OC. OC'ing causes instability in many cases. OC'ing is also about 75% luck and 25% skill. Sometimes you simply get parts that refuse to OC with any amount of stability. Buying a processor that's good enough to game with without OC'ing is much cheaper than frying 2 or 3 processors.
On top of that, processor speed means NOTHING compared to how important your videocard and RAM are concerning gaming. If you want a fast processor, that's one thing...but do you know why? Games would much rather have a faster videocard and more RAM than a fast processor. Benchmarks today are still reporting that a processor from the Athlon XP days will run a game just as fast as an Athlon 64 if you have a nice videocard and a nice amount of RAM.
Overclocking is just not worth it unless you have a system specially ordered from a site that guarantees OC'ing performance. Otherwise it's just a luckfest while you cross your fingers hoping the FSB will go up without getting a bluescreen. If I were you, I'd forget water cooling or OC'ing in general and just buy a $150 processor that will run games as fast as a $750 processor combined with the right videocard and RAM.
-Lasereth