I agree with your last statement, that it may be a moot point by the time the lawyers get through with it. So... let's say that the NHL plays with replacement players next year, and the cup gets awarded to the winning team filled with:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ForgottenKnight
some guy who isn't good enough to play in the NHL could have his name on it due to an NHL.
|
????
Is this not even worse? shouldn't the historical intent of the cup be honoured above the recent history of NHL stewardship?
Adrienne Clarkson had some good points back in February, when she suggested that the women should play for it. It may not be supported by the male dominated sentiments in this country, but the IDEA of providing an option during the times that the NHL fails in its stewardship of the cup is the important thing here.
It should be a simple business process, not requiring the enrichment of corporate lawyers to achieve...