|
I have mixed feelings on that. I understand that the cup should be awarded to the best team in the land each year, and that if the NHL isn't playing then it should still be awarded. But the NHL has had control of the cup for so long now that it doesn't seem right that some guy who isn't good enough to play in the NHL could have his name on it due to an NHL. Besides, the winners of the teams that the lawyers want to play each other for it already won the top prise for their league. Shouldn't they stop there? I'd also have to think that by the time the lawyers get done arguing in court, the NHL will be back in session for the new year, and it'll be too late to do anything about it.
__________________
"People say I'm strange, does that make me a stranger?"
|