Phage

I am sorry, I seem to be at a disadvantage. Can I spontaneously change my position at the drop of a hat as well? At 3:51 you say that no loving relationship involves hitting, and suggest that they seek counseling, and then a mere 2 hours later say that you enjoy being hit and that you would never tell anyone how to run their relationships. Can you explain how these posts do not contradict themselves?

--- oops, you have edited your post while I was writing this, so let me continue.

Everyone is assuming that the woman did not want to be hit; ok, that makes sense even though nobody seems to feel the need to ask her. In that case we have a system of dealing with those situations, namely the law. People can be hurt in many different ways, many of them not criminal, and it is up to those injured to decide if they want to press charges. Making judgements about the nature of the incident without a clue as to the disposition of the injured party is arrogant to the extreme.

There you go again, defining a "healthy" relationship by your own standards. What justification do you have to say if it is "healthy", and even if it is not "healthy" why can they not continue with it if they do not mind?

------------
And I think you are wildly flailing your opinions around to the detriment of others; at least their domestic violence did not damage the community.

If gays were "reasonable individuals" then they would stop being gay; I mean what do they expect to happen, besides having pleasure? If they did not like it, it will probably never happen again. If the woman thinks it necessary she will press charges; she has not yet.


The bottom line is that it is up to the injured parties(the woman in this case) to decide if she liked it or not, and if she did not if it requires punishment. Nobody has asked the woman, so anyone attacking the actions of the boyfriend are poking their nose someplace it does not belong.