|
I have a hard time finding your legitimate points.
You've been saying the same thing over and over again. That an Israeli commision founded Sharon indirectly responsible therefore you believe that implies he as well as everyone else had no clue what was going on. How much faith should I put in a finding put forth by the Israeli government concerning an attoricty alledgedly commited by its own people? It may seem totally impartial to you, but it's far from it to me.
What about my post with all the different sources linking Sharon directly to the two massacres? They indicate that he was an integral part of what occured. You did not address any of those points.
Excuse me if I don't take all of your claims as "facts". You provide no sources but you accuse me of dodging your fact-based arguments? What'd I ignore?
|