|
Slight issue with all of your suggestions:
This was on an Indian reservation.
Even if a law was created giving teachers the right to carry arms, it would have no meaning there. Likewise, the tribe could pass a law arming teachers, and it would not apply outside the tribe.
Keep in mind, this was not actually in the United States. I know that is hard to accept, and some think it is silly, but tribes are independent nations seperate from the United States. Our laws and rights do not apply there. get pulled over for speeding in a reservation, and you will discover real fast that you do not have your constitutional rights, like due proccess.
As for those advocating arming teachers inside the United States (as opposed to in Independent Tribal nations), please explain who pays for the guns and training. Is there pay increased from having to work in a dangerous environment given how many schools have had shootings? (Trick question, no teachers pay has been increased for sustaining a threatening environment daily)
Your arguments are meaningless without explaining / suggesting the funding that makes it happen.
__________________
Seen on an employer evaluation:
"The wheel is turning but the hamsters dead"
____________________________
Is arch13 really a porn diety ? find out after the film at 11.
-Nanofever
|