If it's conceivable to "wait out" the leadership in Iran then why was it not conceivable to "wait out" the leadership in Iraq? I mean, Saddam has to die eventually right? Same with the mullah etc....so what's the diff? Why not invade Iran, who actually have WMD, when we arbitrarily, casually, and nonchalantly invaded Iraq? Just putting that out there too.
I think there is something to be said about that previous post "people power thingy" - I find it encouraging that Iraqis are demonstrating against terrorism, Iranian (not Persian) students protest against mullahs. and that Iraqis are actually defending themselves too. A good case for the 2nd Amendment there, that's for sure.
I'm just not so sure of the level of our government involvement in interfereing in other countries as foreign policy
|