Quote:
|
Originally Posted by matthew330
If a grown man is incapable of leading young people in a social club (which has NOTHING to do with ones sexuality), without revealing his sexual preference, then he shouldn't be leading them in the first place.
|
So Scoutmasters should be non-dating Bachelors? Certainly being married is a clear statement of the scountmaster's sexual preference.
I know that verges on reductio ad absurdum, but roll it over in your head a few times. Sexuality is biological. One has not got a choice in the matter. Oh sure, one can exercise their will and submerge their sexuality, but should they have to if they are reasonably discreet about it? And, by discreet, I mean having sex in private, not avoiding showing their partner some affection in public.