Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KMA
I am not going to argue that a smoker is at significant risk for lung cancer because he/she smokes; the evidence is overwhelming and the methods used in attaining the evidence are not questionable.
|
The tobacco industry disputed the risks of cancer from smoking for decades. They questioned the evidence.
For example:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kutulu
Do they mention any of the 50 million causes of cancer or heart disease and show how they eliminate them as contributing factors? Smoking rates have drastically decreased over the last 10 years. Has there been a comprable decrease in lung cancer or heart disease during that time period?
|
Look, someone just questioned your "unquestionable" data that smoking kills!
If you want to believe the entire medical establishment is conspiring to make it seem as if second hand smoke is dangerous, that's your option.
We know that the tobacco industry has conspired to make it seem that smoking isn't dangerous.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KMA
I am going to argue that a non-smoker is at significant risk for lunk cancer because of the small amount of time in their lives they are around second-hand smoke; the evidence is very questionable.
|
Workers in the hospitality industry spend years upon years exposed to second hand smoke.