Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Manx
Not really. You altered and minimized roachboy's point in order to defeat it with a a marginal dismissal.
You don't have to defend anything that you post - but that doesn't mean someone else can't continue to question you on what you post. You were questioned, and your effective answer was only: because I choose to.
Which was obviously the case, though it is a non-answer answer.
|
I just re-read roachboy's post and my reply to it and needless to say, I find your conclussion erroneous.
He didn't address anything that I said, but instead chose to question if I would attack lies made by right leaning individuals.
This is the sine qua non of attack by diversion, which I pointed out.
As to YOUR post, you also chose not to address the issues, but instead chose to reformulate the diversionary attack by the implication that if I didn't attack the right leaning with the same frequency, that my current point in this thread must be worthless and worthy of ignoral.
In other words, the same diversionary tactic in a slightly different flavor.
But in any case, I DID address his post (which you ignore) by saying that yes, I will point them out and have done so in this very forum.