|
What a tapdance - He makes unfounded claims that Krugman supposedly cannot tolerate those who disagree with him or who support the war in any way. Seems the only reference Klugman made to Cavuto was Cavuto's view that those who opposed the war are 'sickening'. Not exactly the pot calling the kettle black, more like the pot calling the toaster black.
He claims that Klugman "implies" Fox News' "pandering" to the White House over the War in Iraq. Klugman however, specifically uses the word pandering (using Fortune magazines words) in reference to Fox's relationship with the Chinese Government.
Cavuto of course doesn't mention China at all - Childish and incredibly dishonest writing from Cavuto.
Cavuto almost helps Klugman prove his thesis by writing an article of reply that perfectly defines where American journalism is nowdays.
|