View Single Post
Old 01-31-2005, 08:27 PM   #63 (permalink)
Ananas
Still Crazy
 
Ananas's Avatar
 
Location: In my own time
I've been with both "cut" and "uncut" men.

1. Cleanliness/odor - my men kept themselves clean, so no big problem. The uncut men had a more distinctive scent, not unpleasant at all. All men should be washing before and after sex anyway (and if they aren't, you should be insisting that they do). Also, most uncut men would wash, or wipe with a damp cloth, after urinating, which also helped. No problems in this area.

2. Appearance - didn't matter. Each was different, unique. I thought the uncut men to be more intriguing because of the anticipation to see what was hidden beneath the "tommy hat".

3. Reaction/response - uncut men, hands down. The uncut men were quicker to respond to any kind of stimulation, had more to work with, it was exciting to manipulate their foreskins, the natural lubrication was an absolute bonus! Just my experience, but the uncut men were more sensitive, and more vocal, during sex. I didn't see a major difference in staying power neither. Nancy is right about the "string".

BTW: Irish Sean, poor hygiene runs across the board, so does poor taste.
Ananas is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73