The timing couldn't be better. I've bought hubby subscriptions to Playboy in the past and I got him the SI edition with Anna a few months ago. He knows I know he looks at mags and porn and that I'm fine about it. Tonight we were watching "That 70's Show" and I commented how Laura Prepon's "Donna" always seems to be at least 1/3 or more covered up in outfits while "Jackie" (couldn't tell you her real name) prances about in string bikinis.
I questioned whether or not it was the networks doing, in that they don't think she fits the typical hollywood "waif" image, or herself thinking she doesn't fit that ideal and is too insecure to show her body. Although I'm not Bi, I can totally appreciate the female body and I think Laura's is the ideal. Not too thin or overweight, just perfect with curves and a little meat on her bones. Hubby then tells me that she (Prepon) is not at all shy about her body because someone at work brought in a copy of FHM, in which she has posed. I was flabbergasted, why does "Donna" only show a little bit of flesh then as opposed to "Jackie" who is supposidly a slut? I'd heard of Playboy, Hussler, etc., but not FHM. Either hubby doesn't know or has been too embarressed to tell me what the mag is. I don't really care either way, I am mostly posting because we happened to be talking about it tonight and I thought it was too coincedental that I'd read this post tonight. Carry on...
Ali
.
__________________
'Beware the Jabberwock, my son! The jaws that bite, the claws that catch! Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun, The frumious Bandersnatch!'--Jabberwocky, Lewis Carroll
"You cannot do a kindness too soon because you never know how soon it will be too late."--Ralph Waldo Emerson
Last edited by alicat; 01-28-2005 at 09:25 PM..
|