This is among the best "non-conspiracy" posts in this discussion so far. Excelent work, rahvin. The problem is the hole on the other side. The object clearly did not leave any kind of burn marks or damage to the lawn, making the only poissible decent angle pretty steep. This would have sent the nose of the plane through the first and second stories going into the basement and sub basement. Makes perfect sense. But what about the photo of the 16' hole in the inner most wall?
This hole is located on the inner most wall and is on the exact path of the projectile, HOWEVER, it is parallel to the crash on the front of the building.
If the plane hit at a downward angle, which would have lead it to a very much downward angle crash, why is there is there a 16' hole there? Odd, indeed.
Also, the 747 that hit the Pentagon ahd roughly the same amount of fuel as the planes that struck the WTC, and you can see in videos taken that there were prettty serious explosions upon impact for both. The fire at the WTC was able to destroy
(what I've been told by engineers) one of the best reinforced structures in the world. It was actually built to take a plane strike. So those buildings obviously collapsed after a while. In this picture taken on September 15th, 2001, you get an excelent
overview of the damage.
So a steel reinforced building was gone in a matter of hours, but the Pentagon just saw some fires and one collapse due to the initial impact.