View Single Post
Old 12-13-2004, 03:48 AM   #60 (permalink)
Mephisto2
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMA-628
Gawd this is getting old. How do you justify trying to define an entire populace based on the actions of a lunatic fringe?

99.8% of the complaints filed with the FCC are from one, miniscule religious organization that most people don't even care about.
LINK

And you want to define an entire nation by these people?
Well, first of all, if it's "getting old" then don't read my posts and move along.

Secondly, I prefaced my statement with an apology as I knew it would possibly annoy some people.

Thirdly, unbeknownst to you and everyone else who read the initial post, I was drunk when I wrote this and my usual attempts to temper natural human exasperation were probably reduced.


Quote:
And of course, the obvious aspects to this are being entirely ignored:

1) We have a free enough society that these people can spout whatever they want without fear of retribution. Yet, most everyone here wants to quell the freedoms that don't match their own beliefs.

2) The FCC has to respond to the complaint; it doesn't mean they will find in favor of it. Imagine if the FCC ignored any complaints?
I don't disagree.

Quote:
In other words, there is nothing to see here, move along folks.
Well, there's obviously enough to create a two page thread in the time it takes me to go out, get drunk with my friends, come home, read a story, post to TFP, get up the following morning and fly to Sydney...

All about 36 to 48 hours.

So it's obviously of sufficient enough interest to generate at least some debate. Feel free to move along yourself though...


Quote:
We should be proud in the fact that we live in a place where even the idiots have free speach.
I get so tired of hearing this kind of comment, bandied about as if America was the only country with freedoms. In fact, the US has more restrictive publicly accessible airwaves than most "Western" countries. But that's a whole different issue.

Quote:
Should we define all Irish people based on their lunatic fringe? Nope.

Should we define all Austrailians based on their lunatic fringe? Nope.

Why are we trying to define Americans by the lunatic fringe(s) that we have?
We're not.

Quote:
Or....are we just running out of thread ideas in the Politics Forum?
What was the point of that last comment?


It's created a lot more debate than many other topics so far this week.


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360