View Single Post
Old 12-08-2004, 02:36 PM   #45 (permalink)
smooth
Junkie
 
Location: Right here
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebell
Not knowing the marriage laws of those states, I can't say conclusively, but if indeed a 13 year old can marry anyone of any age with parental consent, I would agree that there is a disparity across state lines...but when has this never been the case? Whether we like it or not, the people of that state have decided thus, as have the other states decided as they have. Is this the ideal situation? Obviously not, but I see no easy remedy.

Personally, I would add to any 'reluctance' the historical precident cited above, but in defense of my position, I will reiterate that modern child psychology strongly indicates that children are not ready to make such a life changing decision at that age (such a decision being beyond the simple, "let's lose my virginity") and that parents should still be responsible for such decisions. (That being said, parental permission is still apparently required by said state, giving at least one measure of safety, albiet small and possibly unreliable.)



I believe there are emancipation laws on the books in several states and IMO, this is enough. Even in cases where there is historical precedence, the (young) woman was expected to run a household as the adult wife, age not withstanding.

And perhaps it is my own bias, but I don't think I can ever see a 14 year old as being ready for this. Sixteen would be the youngest I can see as giving this responsibility to, but I admit that I am pulling that number out of the air as an internal compromise.
I think all your points are fair enough and well taken.

I'd like to clarify, however, that in Missouri and Ohio, those aren't marriage statutes. 14 years of age is a legal and acceptable age for unmarried persons to have sex. So had the two people in question in this scenario, regardless of their marital status, simply lived in either of those two states or moved there, their behavior would not have made news, it wouldn't even had been wrong (according to the law).

That said, I can certainly respect someone who says, "hey the law is too low for my standards. 14 or even 16 is just too young, regardless of the law, it's wrong behavior for me and mine to engage in."

Also, you might be interested to know that emancipation won't necessarily absolve someone from AOC restrictions. Just like they don't absolve someone from drinking statutes. Even marriage doesn't protect against sexual constraint legislation.

For example, in Oregon, I interviewed a person who was awaiting trial for violating a statutory rape law. He was charged with raping a minor--his wife of 3 years! They had moved from a state that allowed minors to marry, but she was still underage when they moved to Oregon and, during the report of a burglary on their home, it came to the prosecutors attention that he was married to and sleeping with a minor, according to Oregon law. Tragically, in my opinion, his conviction resulted in a lifetime registration as a sex-offender, which you may or may not know right now, is publicly available in Oregon and sometimes posted on the internet by various police precincts.

Did you hear about the recent case in Idaho where the prosecutor is charging the minor with a crime, too?

All these factors point out to me that our society is currently very conflicted about rights and protections of minors. We don't quite know what to do about sexuality in general, our media's portrayal of it in particular, and the messages our capitalist society bombards children with to stimulate consumption.

We don't really know and I think we are, as a social entity, very confused about it all. So my hope was that I wasn't coming across as: this is fine behavior, end of discussion; and at first I'm taken aback by a reply along the lines of: this is not fine behavior, end of discussion.

I think there's a discussion to be had. I think it's necessary and the time is very ripe or we may actually produce more harm for the minors in our society by not helping them make what our society believes are appropriate decisions in safe environments, without shutting their voices out of the process.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
smooth is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360