*slaps forehead*
It's funny, I've never really thought about it before I guess I always took it for granted.
It's kinda like a weird cat-and-mouse game: Stores are too cheap to pay for good security (which would probably reduce insurance/liability), invest in shoddy security, yet can't deter or prosecute theft when it occurs, leading to a loss. It just seems so shortsighted to me. Wouldn't a decent security system simply pay for itself after a while?
|