I skimmed it.
Please point out the section that says the U.S. can torture people it deems as enemies or hold people indefinitely with out any rights what-so-ever. And also if you could point me to the portion that states that the U.S. can hold U.S. citizens indefinitely and without rights and that when the Supreme Court rebukes them, the U.S. can strip the citizenship of the prisoner and force that person out of the country.
'Cause naturally, that is exactly what the U.S. has done - so it must certainly be "legal".
That it is in direct opposition to the principles of this country is why I state that if they are acceptable to protect the country, they are unecessary because the country is already destroyed from within.
|