View Single Post
Old 12-03-2004, 12:01 PM   #44 (permalink)
Yakk
Wehret Den Anfängen!
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebell
I believe they also want to annex Canada, rape all it's natural resources, deport all the French speakers to France, and turn your hot women into Hooters Girls.

Or so I read on a web-page somewhere...

Did you bother visting that website, or did you just dismiss me without even thinking?

It isn't a tin foil hat conspiracy website.

It is a website run by neo-conservatives by neo-conservatives. Articles written by people who are quite high up in the Bush White House that detail reasons for, and means to achieve, unchallenged American military hegemony -- aka, an Empire. Papers from 1992 pushing for a war on Iraq for American "strategic interests" in the region, not because of WMD's, the Iraqi people, Al`Queda links, or any of the other wispy reasons put forward for the war.

You have heard about the Project for a New American Century?

I'm taking the stated agenda of the US right-wing at face value. Not the excuses they use to pass bills, but the policy papers they use to determine what bills to put forward.

Capital gains tax on investments are scheduled to expire. If you earn your money from owning things, you won't get taxed for it. If you earn your money by work, you will. This isn't some kind of projection, that is on the law books right now.

Inheritance taxes, which only hit 2% of estates, are going away. A family estate of less than 1 million $ isn't even touched by this tax These taxes hit large estates, and discouraging multi-generation economic dynasties. edit: Almost all of the tax revenue from this tax comes from multi-multi million dollar estates.

Know who DeLay is? Ask him what his position on the seperation of church and state is? How about Scalia?

How many liberal politicians have been called unpatriotic and traitors for daring to actually oppose right-wing politicians? How many judges where appointed by Bush without Senate oversight during the last 4 years, using the 'out of session' loophole? How many judges which the Senate refused to confirm got appointed this way?

I wish I was wearing a tin-foil hat. I'm not talking about vague trends, fears, or slippery slopes. I'm just reading the position papers of the policy makers, and the laws they have already passed.

I know most of this doesn't matter. Many people seem to select a political party, then decide on their morality and political opinions based off the party. The party they support can do no wrong, because that would mean they are wrong.
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
Yakk is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360