View Single Post
Old 11-19-2004, 08:03 AM   #14 (permalink)
Yakk
Wehret Den Anfängen!
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfpack0102
"Did you make up that 75 000 salary?"

no i did not make this number up. Civil servants are vastly overpaid
So, you are saying you didn't make it up.

Find me any evidence of a 75 000 dollar secretary that would have 30 000 in the private service. You didn't make it up, so this should be easy for you.

Quote:
Quote:
Yakk wrote:
In any case, I'd munch up a bunch of debt. We have a huge trade surplus, our economy doesn't need a huge stimulus, and interest rates are low and rising. A good time to clean up your debt. Because if not now, when? If not us, who?
i agree with this but i for one am pissed off that 100 million dollars goes missing and not very much is done about it. That is alot of money unaccounted for that was wasted at our expense. nice to see our hard earned dollars at work!
Sponsorship scandal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJRousseau
Right, But interest rates haven't dropped that much in the past five years and even so, lower debt servicing does not result in an increase in overall spending. Just the opposite. And, that spending has far outpaced economic growth.
177.6 revenue in 2002/2003
133.3 program expenses
37.3 debt charges
7 surplus

123.3 revenue in 1994/1995
118.7 program spending
42.0 debt charges
-37.5 deficit

Growth (in non-real dollars) of spending from 1994 to 2002 is 1.46%. Canadian inflation is about 2.2%, so that's a 0.74% per year shrink in spending.

This is less than inflation.

Revenue has grown at 4.67%. Inflation is about 2.2%, which means the 'real dollar' revenue growth is about 2.47%. GDP Growth over this period has averaged 3.5%.

My data comes from http://www.fin.gc.ca/access/budinfoe.html

Quote:
Spending in 96/97 was $104 Billion. In 99/00 in was $107 Billion. For 03/04 it was forecast at $178 Billion. Rising in 05/06 to $191 Billion. That is assuming equal or lower debt servicing. THAT is a huge wad of taxation.
Your numbers are way off -- please cite a source. Your old numbers don't include debt servicing, I'm pretty certain, and your new numbers include the surplus and the debt service.
__________________
Last edited by JHVH : 10-29-4004 BC at 09:00 PM. Reason: Time for a rest.
Yakk is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360