Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fckm
well, if the evidence was obtained illegally without a warrant, then it should not be allowed.
|
But my point is... whether it's supposed to be included or not, you can't just erase it from your mind.
If it was shown to be nearly impossible to dump that body along with all the concrete blocks and the jurors saw that only to have the judge say, "You can't use that." ... how can that not affect your decision?
That'd be like catching your girlfriend cheating on you because you snuck into this club you weren't supposed to be in in the first place and having someone say, "Forget about it, you weren't supposed to be there to begin with!" Yeah, so? She still cheated.
As for the jurors being replaced - it's ridiculous. Look at what they're replacing them with... all kinds of people that would be biased against him. That's wrong in so many ways.
They make it a point to say "The juror was replaced with a woman aged 20-30 and a mother of four children who wept during the trial as the evidence of the decayed corpses were displayed." Yeah, I'm sure her choice will be one based on fact and evidence as opposed to raw emotion.