Quote:
|
Originally Posted by onetime2
In actuality it was two years in the original chart and that was a substantial part of Bush's Presidency.
|
2004 numbers do not exist outside of estimates.
Quote:
|
The only evidence presented to begin this thread was that chart. It was submitted as proof of poor handling of the economy. The entire discussion isn't flawed because of a lack of one year's data, it is flawed because no correlation exists between budget deficits and "the good handling of the economy".
|
This is my point. Your attempt to dismiss the discussion on the grounds that the first chart is outdated was not effective - and you know this to be true, which is why you are now claiming that entire discussion is flawed because it does not include some other information, which you continue to fail to provide. Sorry, no. The discussion is not flawed because you refuse to contribute to the discussion.
Quote:
|
But I digress. There is no point in continuing down this path. You believe this thread is substantial while I believe the premise it was based upon was flawed from the outset. There is no reconciling our stances and, quite frankly, I have little inclination to educate you about economics.
|
Quite frankly, it would be impossible to "learn" anything from you about economics, considering you continue to refuse to provide ANY information on economics. Take your superiority complex elsewhere and please refrain from dismissing discussions simply because you refuse to partake in them.