Quote:
Originally Posted by KMA-628
See, you are missing it again. That was not onetime2's point at all.
He stated, ratherly clearly I might add, that you cannot START a discussion on this type of topic with old and outdated data. You would get laughed off of any economic stage.
Yes, Mephisto posted a second graph, that is not what onetime2 is talking about.
|
Onetime attempted to do something which was impossible: completely discount a discussion because a single piece of 40 pieces of information was not presented. Sorry, but his insistence that the entire crux of the opinion in the first post is invalid because 1 year of 40+ is estimated (but actually known) is absurd.