Quote:
Originally Posted by scout
HAHA that suggestion that they were WMDs didn't come from some spin site or news. It was merely something I was pointing out. If in fact some of them could be used to detonate nuclear weapons and we already know from various news reports they also had other ingredients for nuclear weapons, essentially they had WMDs. Therefore the war was justified. You all can't have it both ways, so if I was Kerry I would procede very carefully in this push of news that is essentially over a year old.
|
Ya'll are probably getting as tired of reading this as I am of writing it, but here we go again.
First, all intelligence reports have concluded that Saddam did not have an active nuclear weapons program. I don't know what you're referring to, but it doesn't jibe with the Duelfer report or any of the other intelligence estimates.
Regardless of that, if your WMD conclusion is so logical, why are you and a few other posters the only people I see bringing it up? Why isn't the Bush administration screaming this from the highest mountain? Are they that stupid? Somehow I doubt it. HAHA, indeed.