You can't have it both ways. Some of these explosives are used to detonate nuclear weapons. Does this mean that there were in fact at least the makings of WMDs in Iraq? Was Bush right in his assessment? Was all the intelligence at least partially correct? If we are to make the jump that there is conclusive evidence the explosives was there when our troops arrived couldn't we also make the jump that whatever happened to these explosives is probably what happened to the WMDs? Y'all can't have yer cake and eat it too. Either they had at least the makings of WMDs or they didn't.
|