Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SirSeymour
Am I the only one here who read that and wondered what the real evidence behind the article is? One "anonymous souce" who is identified as an "intelligence officer" is not really actual evidence. At the moment, this is little better than hearsay.
Not that I don't admit it could be true but there is nothing concrete in this article at all.
|
It was a 17-month investigation by the CIA (really 11 people I think). But do you really think that the whole thing is based on hearsay? And while it actually is only hearsay as of now, its because its being withheld! and no one really knows its contents.
Edit: oh, and this was only one article about the incident, you can find more if you look, that are from other sources.