Originally Posted by maximusveritas

I appreciate your effort, but IMO this is just another weak attempt to discredit an entire movie full of valid points by nitpicking a few minor points. I realize you were limited to 5, but couldn't you have found better examples? I guess not. The Kopel article is more of the same but still adds up to a whole lot of nothing.

The funny thing is that you commit just as serious a violation as Moore when you misrepresent the claims he makes in the movie. Why can't you provide a direct quote from the movie? It's probably because Moore never made those claims and you needed to create a straw man to easilly tear down.

I realize that the movie is not completely accurate. That's obvious. It would be practically impossible to create such a movie and for Moore to claim this is dishonest. However, to claim that one shouldn't watch the movie or believe anything in it is equally dishonest and leads people to bury their head in the sand and dismiss reality.