Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
You could argue that Bush is the one doing it, but you would be wrong.
Its the other guys who fought, or should other vets not have the right to speak out about Kerry?
Bush has never attacked Kerry for his service while in Vietnam. The vets who are have been doing so long before Bush was president, they really don't like Kerry.
|
I might as well point out that the vets didn't seem to have much problem with Kerry until he ran for president, and that there are strong connections between Bush and the SBVs (hint: they have the same lawyer).
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in638389.shtml
Anybody who knows anything about Karl Rove knows that the SBV attack is in line with at least two things he likes to do: 1. acting through surrogates, and 2. attacking an opponent where he seems to be strongest.
Is Bush doing it? Not directly, but he is the man that Republicans touted as being a good delegator. You know, somebody who knows how to manage people and operations without handling all the nitty gritty details on his own? Doesn't he cause a lot of things to happen that he can't really take credit for, even though he started it?