Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OpieCunningham
The connection is right there in your post.
We invaded Iraq because Bush said we had to do something BEFORE Iraq does something with its' WMDs.
Yes, there are a slew of other reasons given these days for why we needed to invade Iraq. But the report demonstrates that most Bush supporters believe that the initial and main reason is still valid even though it is not.
I don't see how anyone can claim that their belief that Iraq had WMDs and a connection to Al Qaeda is NOT affecting their judgement on who to vote for.
|
BEFORE something happens is different than BEFORE WMDs
I meant it in correlation to 9/11. I feel Bush is more likely to pursure targets outside the US rather than waiting for them.
That said even mr.kerry said Saddam was an imment threat- so your saying that when a democrat is for the war, he is sane, but when a republican is hes disalussional?