|
I think that cloning for research, especially stem cell research, is not only acceptable, but our moral imperative to help aid those that are sick and dying of diseases that might be treated from such research.
I think that cloning for the purpose of recreation is morally acceptable, but as was pointed out, you are just moving forward one generation a genetic set that was not supposed to recreate. It's acceptable, but I don't think it's beneficial to humanity at large.
I think that cloning to replace dead pets, children, grandparents, etc. is just ludicrous. Again, I don't see it as morally aprehensible, but I also don't see it as beneficial to humanity at large.
Lastly, I believe (honestly) that the ultimate form of cloning will be to clone ones own self for the purpose of future brain transplantation into a new, younger, stronger body, thus making one immortal to some degree. The concept of a brain transplant is, of course, rather crazy by today's standards. However, I think most people reading these forums know enough about science and discovery to rule out ever saying that something is impossible. This also would require one to transcend religion bounds that say the soul is an important part of humanity. If your brain carries your thoughts, memory, personality and knowledge, you could be a complete yet soulless being (like Christians believe animals to be?). Hmmm...
|