This was a preemptive war (can't argue with that). This was a war based, at least in the beginning, on weapons of mass destruction (can't argue with that). Geroge W. Bush has said that we did not find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (can't argue with that, see the debates for proof). Therefore, we attacked Iraq because we thought they had WMD, but they didn't. Now I don't remember anyone apologizing for that. Actually, we still occupy Iraq. A preemptive war not based in truth on a body that never threatened the U.S. I don't know much about the law, but if there isn't a law against this, shouldn't there be?
We, the USA, are going to find ourselves in a bad position if someone decides to press charges in a world court. They say they need to charge people, we say no. They insist, we say no. What happnes next?
The good in Bush is that he is consistant. At least we know how he will respond. I suppose that's one of the few things he has over Kerry.
|