Quote:
Originally Posted by Superbelt
There is a clear distinction between the candidates. One is in favor of stem cell research and the other is opposed. There is NOTHING wrong, with saying you side with Reeves and will work dilligently to see that his condition can be corrected in the future. He is not being used as a club against Bush in Edwards statement but as a honeypot. Nothing wrong with that, admirable in fact.
|
I agree, but.
I do not think that either side is against stem cell research. I think that both sides would like to see that we will one day be able to help those in Reeves' position. They differ in how they see getting there
And to answer a question of me above, I feel that Mr. Reeves was self centered in his movement. And as someone who will one day work to help those in need like Mr. Reeves, I wish that he would have cared about a noble cause before his accident.