Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
You have to say the guy with the nicest hair, and biggest smile. Substance has no meaning. On the morning after Edwards will be declared the winner. On election day we will see that it was Cheney.
One question for Edwards: As a trial attorney how did you justify taking up to 40% of the judgements won by the victims you represented?
|
I know this is completely off-topic, but allow this Bush voter to get on my high horse here for a minute.
Because he invested $100,000 + in most of those cases, in his money, not even counting his time; without his investment of time and money the insurance co.s would not have paid the victims anything, and because a good plaintiff's attorney knows how to increase the value of a case so that it's worth enough that the jury or defendant decides to award the plaintiff enough that even with taking 33% out, the victim is well compensated. Yeah, it's brutal, but trust me, ins. cos. screw alot more people, alot more often than any plaintiff's attorney ever thought about.
I still think Cheney will deliver a better performance.