Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bodyhammer86
You, my friend, are absolutely right. Hell, even the democrats thought he had wmds.
|
No, it's absolutely wrong. There was a LOT of doubt about WMD's - so much so that most nations chose not to join us in our invasion of Iraq. Their best evidence, presented by Colin Powell to the UN, was shaky and circumstantial at best, and the majority of the world saw through it. Of course, the response of Bush and his cowboys was to jeer at these nations (*cough*France*cough*) and encourage national hatred of them, thus proving not only their stupidity, but their immaturity as well.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bodyhammer86
This isn't evidence that at one point in time, he did possess wmd's? http://www.kdp.pp.se/chemical.html Next time, try to ask a question that takes less than 5 seconds worth of searching to answer. |
The United States at one time had slaves. Should we be put on trial now for what we had in the past and got rid of?
The issue was not whether Iraq had WMD's some time in the murky past, but whether Iraq had them at the time the war started. And all signs point to the fact that Iraq did not have them.