View Single Post
Old 09-16-2004, 04:56 PM   #59 (permalink)
skyscan
Tilted
 
Location: Missouri
I declare this thread full of preconceived notions and using little or no facts/news to justify viewpoints. Even if facts/stories were found, would they be found to make what you already "feel" is right proved or to objectively find out the truth?

To point out how futile this discussion has become I will use the following examples:
Quote:
Of course he's going to be pissed off when he is shown for the impotent little weasels that he and his organization are. Of course he's going to whine like a baby when his puny little money-kingdom is overruled by countries who actually have the spine to stand up to insane dictatorships. "Illegal."
I feel that it is very hard to read this and not feel that you are attempting to insult something rather than review their decision. Secondly, if they did support the Iraq war would the UN not be a "money-kingdom?"
Quote:
He buried missles in the sand. He buried ammunition at the bottom of the Tigris river. Underground bunkers & tunnels. There was an infrastructure in place designed to keep Bad Things out of site of satellites.
So what made us think we could find them even if our inspectors were sent in? Also, why haven't we found them if this is the case?

Quote:
The fact that the UN knew all this - but decided to do nothing - besides a policy of appeasing the beast with (broken) resolution after (broken) resolution, is a mark of shame on them.
According to Hans Blix in his appearance on "The O"Reilly Factor" Hans stated: O'REILLY: But 17 violations doesn't sound like cooperation to me.
BLIX: Those 17 violations were before 1998. The entire transcript can be viewed here (I hate the source on that but it is the accual transcript) I'll let you come to your own conclusion.


Quote:
Originally Posted by OpieCunningham
The U.N. is the logical next step in world-wide democracy.
Democracy is tyranny of the majority. If you meant U.S.A. style that would be Constitutional Republic. As I've heard before in world government discussions "Think it's hard to have your voice heard in a country of 293,027,571 (July 2004 est. according to
CIA. World Fact Book ) ? How would your voice be heard in government of 6,379,157,361 ?"
skyscan is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360