thekak,
would you feel the bible to be more legitimate if there weren't 3 synoptic gospels that pulled from a similar (if not a single) source? i have a feeling we'd be debating that the gospels could never be true because they don't bear a resemblance to one another.
i love how people (not necessarily singling you out thekak though i am referencing your post) screams "CONTEXT, WE MUST HAVE CONTEXT!" when interpreting the meaning and significance of scripture (a principle i strongly agree with by the way), yet base refutations on 3 scattered verses.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
~ Winston Churchill
|