View Single Post
Old 09-02-2004, 10:52 AM   #16 (permalink)
bigoldalphamale
Loser
 
besides...as long as we are collectively spending hundreds of billions of dollars to find ways to make humans live longer, reduce infant mortality, and generally assure a certain overpopulation problem...its a waste of time to spend any money or effort on saving the environment. so maybe i have corrected myself...the paradigm shift first needs to come in our way of thinking about the future. do we really need billions more humans living to be 150 years old? or do we need a safe and environmentally stable one to support the human existence as we currently know it. *ponders*
bigoldalphamale is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47