|
obieX, sounds like these people are taking one thing and calling it another.... the first article talks perdominatnly about forces.
the second one feeds you some patronizing garbage and then claims these dimensions would have a finite size... now if you consider the understood definition of a dimension you'd agree that dimensions are infinate within the ?questionable? bounds of the universe... not however thick or wide or long those dimensions that the second article claimed..
that brings me to my next point... how can you measure those dimensions... they would require their own standard of measurement since they are non-spatial
__________________
In the end we are but wisps
|