|
I seem to recall the question being raised during the recent federal elections about the not-withstanding clause being used by the Liberals should they end up in a minority government. From what I remember, Martin flat out refused to implement it, stating the party with the most seats should rule.
Is this right? I think I was politically asleep that day, so I don't remember the finer details.
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing"
- Voltaire
|