hannukah harry

well, it was a chat thread, so nothing athoratative... to quote "This causes an impingement syndrome in the A/C joint and leads to chronic tendinitis or bursitis. it is also a major contributor to rotator cuff problems." my bad, since it's been a couple days, and was mentioned second, it seemed to be of lesser concern.

Quote:

over and over..

wow, you must be one of those amazing people who never learned a single thing from experiance or another person. lucky you learned everythign you know from books and never had to question if they were right or not! aren't you special!

/sarcasm

Quote:

too funny. how does me not posting in this forum before mean that I'm wrong and the general opinion here is the correct one? I already backed up the reasons describing the musculoskeletal properties behind it. if you don't understand you can ask. You on the other hand are contradicting yourself. You say you like proof, yet you haven't given a scientific reason other than saying: "Oh this is what the general opinion is so you must be wrong" Seems like you have no relevent points to make at this stage, even in the beginning for that matter. There must be something in your undergrad degree that is relevent?

you not posting in here doesn't mean your wrong. but the people who post in here often has a general idea of what kind of knowledge each other have. for all we know, you're some guy who thinks the sky is green and the grass is blue and giving the explanation you did doesn't really tell us anything, because it could easily be your opinion that there isn't room for the movement in the joint but that could just be your opinion. without more than making a statement, we only have your word for it. and i don't know you, so that's not going to happen.

you offered peer reviewed literature on it, i asked to make good on it, and you never followed through. ever think that someone else might think that that's because there isn't? taht you're making a statement and can't back it up? that you're just talking out your ass?

but you're right about this, and you're right that i never gave a scientific answer. but i don't feel i need to. why's that? because i wasn't the one making a statement that goes against what is considered common knowledge (which doesn't seem to matter to you, since you never picked up any info from others). you see, if most of us think one thing, and we all picked it up from different sources and have never heard of your argument before, you need to back it up with proof of your argument. that's how discussin/debate works if you want to change people's opinion. you see, you could have taught us all something, but instead, by not backing it up, you come of as a random person telling us that the sky is blue because god used blue paint when making the sky. could you be right god used blue paint? yep, but prove it.

so basically, if you're gonna make a claim that goes against the grain, the burden of proof is on you. i think that's all i ever asked for...

__________________
shabbat shalom, mother fucker! - the hebrew hammer