Quote:
Originally posted by tiberry
LoL!!! I'm all for a debate...but in this case I'll keep it simple.
How is beheading someone on video comparable to hiding a prisoner from the Red Cross? For that matter - what separates killing someone by beheading and dropping a 'smart bomb' on some building? Are you implying that there are "right" and "wrong" ways of killing? Or just that killing is bad in general? If the latter - OF COURSE it is!!! I don't think ANYONE would debate that fact...but how to stop the killing? Just withdraw from Iraq and let what happens happen? Let terrorists roam amuck killing at will yet refrain from killing them because its fundamentally wrong?! What's your idea? If you were president, what would YOU have done?
|
I think you missed the point of what I said. I was mocking people who answer BushCO actions with "the terrorist did X", where X is the next terrorist action. These people seem to think that as long as BushCo isn't quite as bad as the terrorists, everything is fine. If the actions of BushCO are comparable to terrorist actions, (I'm not saying they are) the Senate needs to start impeachment trials.
__________________
I'm leaving for the University of California: Santa Barbara in 5 hours, give me your best college advice - things I need, good ideas, bad ideas, nooky, ect.
Originally Posted by Norseman on another forum:
"Yeah, the problem with the world is the stupid people are all cocksure of themselves and the intellectuals are full of doubt."
|