Quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo Girl
"Yes. We are weak because we don't have to be attached to someone. We are weak because we can exist without a significant other. We are weak because we have our own lives, and our own identities, and don't need a significant other for such."
That is a good thing, i wasn't insulting your ability to be your own person but why must you treat women like crap along the way? Why do you think all women are is sex objects? What is wrong with having a special connection with one girl? Are you saying every happily married person is weak because another person is a source of happiness? Is it really that wrong to share your life with someone? i don't think people who do that are weak at all...
|
you guys should take this to PM's.
I was going to let all of this pass until I read this and it struck a nerve with me. You keep saying that the people who use this information just see women as sex objects. But this is not true at all. The friends I got out with to look for girls all believe the same as I do; that you can have a special, deep connection with a girl that is completely genuine. And two days later you can have a completely different yet still just as deep and fufilling connection with another girl. I feel you are limited by your implied belief that you can only have this "special connection" that most call love with one person at a time. I also think Booradley was saying that some people feel they need to be in a relationship to be "complete", and that in a healthy relationship, both partners should be capable of being independant and complete but when they are together they are so much more. (well maybe it's just my vision of a healthy relationship)