Quote:
Originally posted by billege
The only point they have is that this is bullshit. Straight bigoted bullshit.
Sex (any kind) is a "behaviours that correlate with fluid-transmitted deseases." Doesn't matter much weather it's straight or homo sex. Sex is sex. The assumption that homo sex is "dirtier" than hetero is one that only an ignorant person would make.
Making any assumption about a PERSON based on their choice of hetero or homo sex is bullshit. I'd rather fuck a gay man who always uses condoms than a hetero unprotected slut (man or woman) anyday.
|
I agree. I'm talking about quick and dirty statistics. It is evil, but I'm just putting forward the justification behind it.
You can get an accurate answer to "have you engaged in homosexual sex in the last 6 months" more often than you can get an accurate answer to "are you a dirty slut". Now, I am also pretty sure there are better ways to go about it, possibly some of which are even more accurate, and definately less offensive. And almost certainly there are other methods which are more expensive, less offensive, and far far more accurate.
It becomes a question of how cheap you want your "human products" to be, how plentiful, how risky and how important you consider being offensive.
Claiming that the offensive idiots who propose this sort of thing have no basis for their arguements is equally idiotic. Pointing out why their choice is inefficient, unsafe and offensive is another. I guess if you assume most people view the world in black and white, you will not want to conceed any points to your opponents in order to win your case.