Quote:
Originally posted by krwlz
Dude.... why? The original post was from when I was refered here to get some info. I check it out, post something I intended mostly for humor since everyone else was flaming and I get ripped. In the end most of the people here who brag about their V8's, or ricers... Have only driven the cars they brag about, and probably dont have enough expirience in both kinds of cars to really offer an objective opinion.
Cmon man, grow the fuck up.
|
Alright. I'm going to try really hard not to flame you. However, if you don't want to start shit, don't tell me to 'grow the fuck up'...
I have autocrossed a modified-class turbo 240sx, a street-prepared NA Mr2, and a street prepared LT1 Camaro, and the LT1 Camaro kicked the liviing shit out of both of the other cars...no comparison. The MR2 is mine, and I could effortlessly turn in better times in the Camaro that I very rarely drive, on relatively low speed courses that are mostly sharp turns.
Also, now that you edited the R out of your post, you changed it from being grammatically wrong to being factually wrong.
Observe the Stats for stock cars, sorted by lap time:
Quote:
Originally posted by pocon1
01 acura integra type r 118.346
03 bmw 330ci 118.062
01 honda s2000 113.921
85 honda crx si 113.828
00 honda s2000 113.493
89 chevrolet 350 iroc-z 109.863
95 chevrolet z-28 109.497
99 mazda miata 109.441
99 mazda miata 107.798
|
So, seeing as lower times = better, the Integra Type R, the Peak of Honda Performance, got spanked by both a 95 Z28, AND an 89 Iroc
What interpretation of these stats led you to believe that they supported your statements that camaros win as long as they don't turn?
Alright, that said, there are an Integra, a Camaro, and a worked Firebird at our local autocross that are unbelivably fast cars with good drivers, and the integra usually comes out on top.
And once, just for fun, one of the instructers beat most of the "sports cars" in the field in his bone-stock civic daily driver.
