|
Logical Candidate.
When a candidate for a position of employment, with moderate responsibilty for the fiscal future of a company goes through an interview process they are tested. Certain criteria must be met in order to verify someone is capable and fit to fullfil the obligations of the job.
I find it odd that the most prominent position in the entire country, has no such failsafe testing in place. You would think that the importance of intellect and understanding of leadership qualities, as well as human relations and problem solving skills would be tested before accepting someone as a candidate for President of the United States.
It would seem many of the mistakes we make as a country could be avoided if we had the "right person for the job" in place.
I was wondering if anyone has a perspective to explain the reasoning behind placing the future of an entire country, in the hands of someone who may or may not be suitable to handle the position.
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
|